英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字，中文词皆可：

passant    
a. 向前直走姿势的

向前直走姿势的

passant
adj 1: in walking position with right foreleg raised


请选择你想看的字典辞典：
单词字典翻译
Passant查看　Passant　在百度字典中的解释百度英翻中〔查看〕
Passant查看　Passant　在Google字典中的解释Google英翻中〔查看〕
Passant查看　Passant　在Yahoo字典中的解释Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕

安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • When and why was en passant invented? - Chess Stack Exchange
    From Wikipedia: Allowing the en passant capture is one of the last major rule changes in European chess that occurred between 1200 and 1600, together with the introduction of the two-square first move for pawns, castling, and the unlimited range for queens and bishops (Davidson 1949:14,16,57) Spanish master Ruy López de Segura gives the rule in his 1561 book Libro de la invencion liberal y
  • How do you use en passant? - Chess Stack Exchange
    The capture en passant is about capturing the opponent's pawn that just moved two steps forward Don't worry about memorizing which n-th row it is If your opponent's pawn moved two steps forward, and ended up in the side of your pawn, you can then capture that pawn as if it had moved only one square
  • Can a pawn move 2 spaces if doing so would cause en passant mate?
    An en passant capture may be viewed as retroactively causing a pawn that would have moved two spaces to instead only move one (IMHO, the rules of Duck Chess should interpret EP captures in this fashion), and as such one could argue that the pawn which was captured en passant hadn't moved two spaces so as to block the check
  • Why cant a piece (that isnt a pawn) capture en passant?
    En passant is, for a lack of a better word, an ugly rule It does not flow logically from the "fundamental" rules of chess - it is an exception that serves a specific purpose: to prevent players from forcing walled positions with their pawns, effectively killing any activity in the game (at least, that is my understanding)
  • Why is en passant only possible on the first opportunity?
    The en passant option exists only for the intermediate move (the one in which black either captures or passes) because that's the only move where the pawn is in the right location to be captured
  • Why is en passant hardly heard of? - Chess Stack Exchange
    En passant is a move in chess It is a special pawn capture that can only occur immediately after a pawn makes a double-step move from its starting square, and it could have been captured by an enemy pawn had it advanced only one square
  • Two questions about how the en passant capture works
    En passant can only be played when the enemy pawn moves over your pawn's capture square during it's first move (moving 2 squares); so the answer to both condition 1 and 2 is no It is not possible for a pawn to en passant twice in a row My understanding is in early chess pawns could only move one space at a time, so when the 2 move rules was added they also added en passant to counterbalance
  • castling - Rules: How does right to castle and en passant get . . .
    For en passant this is totally practicable because it just means looking one move ahead Can the en passant actually be played or does a pin prevent it? Whether or not castling is actually playable may be complicated to determine by looking st the deeper future of the game
  • statistics - En passant capture - Chess Stack Exchange
    The en passant statistic would be harder to get a quick estimate of because the situation is so much rarer Maybe someone with a database and some coding skills can oblige But I would expect that statistic to be rather larger than the castling one Quite often, when en passant is possible, it's a good move
  • rules - In the case of en passant, should I move my pawn first or . . .
    However, this does not clarify if, when making an en passant capture, I should move my pawn first or remove the opponent's pawn from the board I understand that the result is pretty identical in both cases, but I wonder what is the preferred consequence if you are playing an international tournament game with strict rules, for example





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009