c++ - How to implement an atomic counter - Stack Overflow Fortunately, the value initializing constructor of an integral atomic is constexpr, so the above leads to Otherwise you'd want to make it -say- a static member of a class that is wrapping this and put the initialization somewhere else
What does atomic mean in programming? - Stack Overflow In the Effective Java book, it states: The language specification guarantees that reading or writing a variable is atomic unless the variable is of type long or double [JLS, 17 4 7] What do
c++ - What exactly is std::atomic? - Stack Overflow Objects of atomic types are the only C++ objects that are free from data races; that is, if one thread writes to an atomic object while another thread reads from it, the behavior is well-defined In addition, accesses to atomic objects may establish inter-thread synchronization and order non-atomic memory accesses as specified by std::memory_order
c++ - How to use std::atomic efficiently - Stack Overflow std::atomic is new feature introduced by c++11 but I can't find much tutorial on how to use it correctly So are the following practice common and efficient? One practice I used is we have a buff
What are atomic types in the C language? - Stack Overflow I remember I came across certain types in the C language called atomic types, but we have never studied them So, how do they differ from regular types like int,float,double,long etc , and what are
sql - What is atomicity in dbms - Stack Overflow The definition of atomic is hazy; a value that is atomic in one application could be non-atomic in another For a general guideline, a value is non-atomic if the application deals with only a part of the value Eg: The current Wikipedia article on First NF (Normal Form) section Atomicity actually quotes from the introductory parts above
How to initialize a static std::atomic data member Since std::atomic_init has been deprecated in C++20, here is a reimplementation which does not raise deprecation warnings, if you for some reason want to keep doing this
When do I really need to use atomic lt;bool gt; instead of bool? Closed 12 years ago Isn't atomic<bool> redundant because bool is atomic by nature? I don't think it's possible to have a partially modified bool value When do I really need to use atomic<bool> instead of bool?