英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字，中文词皆可：


请选择你想看的字典辞典：
单词字典翻译
Neglecting查看　Neglecting　在百度字典中的解释百度英翻中〔查看〕
Neglecting查看　Neglecting　在Google字典中的解释Google英翻中〔查看〕
Neglecting查看　Neglecting　在Yahoo字典中的解释Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕

安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • G. R. No. L-64112 - The Lawphil Project
    At the outset, it referred to what was referred to as inaccuracies in the statement of facts in the petition and added: "The records show that the particular issue of whether a property already devoted to a public purpose can still be expropriated for the same public purpose is not an 'afterthought' and that it was not 'raised one year after
  • G. R. No. 212786 - Supreme Court E-Library
    x x x If the objections to and the defenses against the right of the plaintiff to expropriate the property are overruled, or when no party appears to defend as required by this Rule, the court may issue an order of expropriation declaring that the plaintiff has a lawful right to take the property sought to be expropriated, for the public use or
  • Stages of Expropriation | Expropriation (RULE 67) | SPECIAL CIVIL ACTIONS
    It is anchored on the Philippine Constitution, specifically Article III, Section 9: "Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation " Rule 67, Rules of Court Rule 67 of the Rules of Court governs the procedure for expropriation actions filed in courts
  • The Law on Expropriation in the Philippines: A Comprehensive Legal . . .
    Date Posted: August 5, 2025 ‎ The Law on Expropriation in the Philippines: A Comprehensive Legal Guide This article provides a detailed legal analysis of expropriation proceedings in the Philippines, a legal mechanism by which the government or an authorized entity may acquire private property for public use It is a fundamental power of the state, but one that is strictly regulated by the
  • Eminent Domain: Prior Public Use and the Power of Expropriation
    The RTC ruled in favor of NGCP, stating that a property already devoted to public use is not invulnerable to expropriation, provided it is done directly by the national legislature or under a specific grant of authority to the delegate
  • G. R. No. 165354 - The Lawphil Project
    Lozada, Sr : 59 In light of these premises, we now expressly hold that the taking of private property, consequent to the Government’s exercise of its power of eminent domain, is always subject to the condition that the property be devoted to the specific public purpose for which it was taken
  • G. R. No. 214310 - The Lawphil Project
    (1) the expropriator must enter private property; (2) the entrance in to private property must be for more than a momentary period; (3) the entry into the property should be under warrant or color of legal authority; (4) the property must be devoted to a public use or other wise informally appropriated or injuriously affected; and (5) the
  • Property Rights Dispute Over Unauthorized Government Use of Private . . .
    Below is a comprehensive discussion of property rights disputes arising from the unauthorized use of private land by the government in the Philippines This overview is meant for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice For specific cases or legal questions, it is advisable to consult a qualified attorney
  • The Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation Inc.
    The Lawphil Project - Philippine Laws and Jurisprudence Databank
  • G. R. No. L-14355 - The Lawphil Project
    The case, then, is one of where the city of Manila, under a general authority permitting it to condemn private property for public use, is attempting to convert a property already dedicated to a public use to an entirely different public use; and this, not directly pursuant to legislative authority, but primarily through the sole advice of the
  • G. R. No. 224936 - The Lawphil Project
    Justice Isagani Cruz, one of the foremost constitutionalists in the country holds that property already devoted to public use is still be (sic) subject to expropriation provided that it is done directly by the national legislature or under a specific grant of authority to the delegate "





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009