英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字，中文词皆可：


请选择你想看的字典辞典：
单词字典翻译
53089查看　53089　在百度字典中的解释百度英翻中〔查看〕
53089查看　53089　在Google字典中的解释Google英翻中〔查看〕
53089查看　53089　在Yahoo字典中的解释Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕

安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • Citizens United, Explained - Brennan Center for Justice
    The Supreme Court’s 2010 ruling in Citizens United v Federal Election Commission is a controversial decision that reversed century-old campaign finance restrictions and enabled corporations and other outside groups to spend unlimited money on elections
  • The Role of Super PACs in Elections: What Voters Should Know
    Key Takeaways Super PACs flourished following the landmark Supreme Court case Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (FEC) Political action committees (PACs) can donate directly to candidates but have spending restrictions Super PACs cannot donate directly to candidates or parties but can spend without limits to support or oppose policies or candidates
  • PACs and Super PACs in Federal Election Campaigns: Legal Framework
    Political action committees (PACs) and super PACs play significant roles in federal election campaigns by raising and spending money to influence elections While PACs have been a part of the campaign finance ecosystem for decades, super PACs originated in 2010 This In Focus provides an overview of the legal origins of PACs and super PACs, discusses how each is regulated under federal
  • Super PAC - Wikipedia
    In the 2016 presidential campaign, super PACs were described (by journalist Matea Gold) as "finding creative ways to work in concert" with the candidates they supported and work around the "narrowly drawn" legal rule that separated political campaigns from outside groups super PACs
  • Unveiling Power: The Impact of Super PACs on Modern U. S. Elections
    Super PACs quickly became a dominant force in electoral politics due to their ability to raise and spend vast sums of money Unlike traditional PACs which can contribute directly to candidates but must adhere to strict contribution limits, Super PACs operate independently, funding various campaign operations This independence allows them flexibility to engage in extensive campaign strategies
  • Super PAC - Ballotpedia
    In 1976, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment protects the right of individuals to spend unlimited sums of money on political speech The court upheld limits on contributions to campaigns, but it stated that restrictions on spending "relative to a clearly identified candidate" were unconstitutional
  • The Supreme Courts Decision: Super Pacs Explained
    The 2010 Supreme Court decision, Citizens United v FEC, allowed unlimited spending and donations by super PACs The 2010 Citizens United v FEC Supreme Court decision significantly altered the landscape of campaign finance in the United States by ruling that political spending is a form of protected speech under the First Amendment This ruling effectively allowed for the creation of super
  • Super PACs: AP US Government Study Guide | Fiveable
    Definition Super PACs, or 'independent expenditure-only committees,' are organizations that can raise and spend unlimited amounts of money to influence elections, as long as they do not coordinate directly with candidates or political parties They emerged following the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v FEC in 2010, which lifted restrictions on independent political spending
  • PACs and Super PACs: How Money Flows in American Politics
    Understanding how these entities work is helpful for grasping how special interests, wealthy individuals, and corporations channel their influence through the political system The differences between PACs and Super PACs reveal fundamental tensions in American democracy about free speech, political equality, and the role of money in elections
  • The Citizens United era of money in politics, explained - Vox
    On January 21, 2010, the Supreme Court’s Citizens United v FEC ruling set the stage for larger and larger sums of money to pour into our electoral system In the ruling, a majority of justices





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009